Possible LIRR strike could happen Saturday if no deal is reached | Live updates

WABC logo
Last updated: Monday, May 11, 2026 4:13PM GMT
LIRR workers threaten to strike if no deal is reached soon

NEW YORK (WABC) -- Long Island Rail Road workers could go on strike May 16 if they don't reach a new contract deal with the MTA.

The union representing LIRR workers is pushing for higher pay, but MTA leaders warn that agreeing to those demands could trigger significant fare hikes.

Five unions representing 3,500 workers, including engineers, signalmen and trainmen, are threatening to strike if an agreement cannot be reached.

The MTA says if a strike happens, it will roll out a contingency plan that includes shuttle buses to help move riders.

Key Headlines

Here's how the news is developing.
2 hours and 8 minutes ago

When was the last LIRR strike?

If there is a strike this weekend, it will mark the railroad's first strike in more than 30 years.

The last one happened back in 1994 and shut down service for two days.

Before that, there was a longer LIRR strike in 1987 that lasted 11 days.

Recent strike threats in 2025 were avoided through federal mediation.

2 hours and 8 minutes ago

MTA says wage increase could result in 8% fare hike

Five unions representing 3,500 workers, including engineers, signalmen and trainmen, are threatening to strike on May 16.

The unions and LIRR have agreed to a retroactive 9.5% wage increase covering the last three years. But, the sticking point remains an additional 5% raise the workers want beginning this year.

The MTA says that's too high. The MTA has also pushed back about some of the lucrative penalty pay workers receive when tasked with certain jobs during a shift.

MTA officials say if they give LIRR workers what they are asking for, it could result in a fare hike as high as 8%.

2 hours and 8 minutes ago

BLET and LIRR unions hold day of action

The LIRR unions held a large rally on Saturday at the LIRR station in Massapequa.

They called it a "day of action to protest the MTA's inaction."