2026 NBA Finals: Biggest takeaways from Knicks-Spurs Game 1
The 2026 NBA Finals are finally here as only two teams remain in the playoff field, vying for a chance to raise the Larry O' Brien Trophy.
The New York Knicks swept the Cleveland Cavaliers in the Eastern Conference finals to reach the championship round for the first time since 1999. They will look to end a decades-long drought, as they haven't won an NBA Finals series since 1973.
The San Antonio Spurs, in the finals for the first time since 2014, will look to rally behind their rising superstar Victor Wembanyama and a cast of young players. They're coming off a contentious seven-game series in the Western Conference finals against the defending champions, the Oklahoma City Thunder.
After each game, our NBA insiders will break down the biggest takeaways for both teams, overreactions to keep an eye on and what to watch as the series continues.
More coverage:
Schedules and results |Offseason guides
(3) New York Knicks lead the (2) San Antonio Spurs1-0
Game 1: Knicks 105, Spurs 95
Biggest takeaways for the Spurs: San Antonio released its grip on Finals opening night supremacy, falling for the first time in Game 1 after posting a 6-0 record all time in the first game of the final round. Spurs guards Stephon Castle, De'Aaron Fox and Dylan Harper struggled mightily against Jalen Brunson, who scored 19 of his game-high 30 points in the second half. San Antonio boasts arguably the league's most impactful defender in Wembanyama, but the visitors destroyed the Spurs in the paint, outscoring the home team 50-42 in that area. -- Michael C. Wright
Biggest takeaways for the Knicks:This team didn't appear to be awed by the atmosphere, nor the specter of Wembanyama. Though New York led for only 19 minutes, 31 seconds of game time, Brunson'stakeover in the fourth quarter was a winning formula. He took 30 shots in total for 30 points, with nine attempts in the fourth. Once New York shut down the Spurs' 3-point shooting, it seemed like just a matter of time before the Knicks would take firm control and establish themselves in the series. A familiar formula: Karl-Anthony Towns early, Brunson late. -- Vincent Goodwill
Game 1 overreaction: The Knicks are now the favorites
The verdict: Overreaction.
Yes, the Knicks have taken home court from San Antonio, and Wembanyama certainly looked like his energy was still sapped from the grueling seven-game slugfest with the Thunder. But Brunson -- though he made some remarkable shots -- was extremely inefficient. San Antonio left a lot on the table, and we have already seen the Spurs win two games in Oklahoma City.
What isn't an overreaction, though? This series is going six games -- at least. -- Tim Bontemps
Stat to know: Brunson also had his 38th 25-point playoff game with the Knicks -- the second most in franchise history, behind only Patrick Ewing (43). The Knicks are 6-0 this postseason when Brunson scores 30-plus points.
What to watch for in Game 2
Game 2: New York at San Antonio (Friday, 8:30 p.m. ET, ABC)
The Spurs gave away a 14-point lead in front of an exceptional home crowd because their offense fell off a cliff in the second half once the Knicks tightened up their transition defense. Wembanyama could have played a more forceful game, but the Spurs finished with their lowest scoring total this postseason because they couldn't find anyone besides Julian Champagnie capable of consistently hitting 3s. Champagnie carried over his hot shooting from the end of the conference finals by hitting five attempts from deep, but the rest of San Antonio's rotation combined to shoot 6-for-33 (18.2%) from outside. The Spurs entered the Finals ranked fourth in 3-point efficiency in the playoffs, so they should expect Wembanyama, Fox, Devin Vassell and Castle to show improvement in Game 2 and beyond. -- Ben Golliver
]
