Lori Loughlin, Mossimo Giannulli guilty pleas came after 'huge emotional and physical toll' of case: Report

OTRC logo
Thursday, May 28, 2020
Inside Lori Loughlin & husband's guilty plea in college admissions scandal
Lori Loughlin and husband Mossimo Giannulli abruptly changed course and pleaded guilty in the college admissions scandal last week recognizing that the experience had taken "a huge emotional and physical toll on both of them," according to a new report.

Actress Lori Loughlin and her husband Mossimo Giannulli abruptly changed course and pleaded guilty in the college admissions scandal last week recognizing that the experience had taken "a huge emotional and physical toll on both of them," according to a new report from People magazine.

Loughlin and Giannulli pleaded guilty Friday to paying half a million dollars to get their two daughters into the University of Southern California as part of a college admissions bribery scheme, but a judge has not decided whether he'll accept the deals they made with prosecutors.

Under their proposed deals, Loughlin, 55, hopes to spend two months in prison and Giannulli, 56, is seeking to serve five months. U.S. District Judge Nathaniel Gorton scheduled their sentencing hearings for Aug. 21.

Citing sources, People reported this week that the couple "deeply regret what they did."

"Previously, Lori and her husband really didn't want any jail time, so they rejected any offer where jail was on the table," People senior writer Steve Helling said in an interview with "Good Morning America." "She was the one who is rejecting the offers first off because she had a specific idea of how she thought that this needed to be done."

He added: "Because this isn't a whole lot of time and because they'd be able to move on quickly, they decided now was the time to make the deal."

If the judge approves the plea, Loughlin will serve two months in prison.

As to whether or not the couple will actually serve time in jail as nonviolent offenders in many places are being released for their own safety due to the coronavirus pandemic, ABC News legal analyst Dan Abrams said it's "almost certain."

"And if the reason they made this deal was because of COVID, that may end up coming back to bite them," he continued.

Loughlin and Giannulli had been scheduled to go to trial in October on charges that they got their two daughters into USC as crew recruits, even though neither girl was a rower. Prosecutors say they funneled money through a sham charity operated by college admissions consultant Rick Singer, who has pleaded guilty to orchestrating the scheme.

Prosecutors recorded phone calls and emails showing the couple worked with Singer to get their daughters into USC with fake athletic profiles depicting them as star rowers. In one email, Singer told Loughlin and Giannulli he needed a picture of their older daughter on a rowing machine in workout clothes "like a real athlete."

Giannulli responded, according to the court filings: "Fantastic. Will get all" and sent Singer the photo.

Loughlin's lawyers say they want to prove that the family thought they were giving money to a charitable cause.

Prosecutors also had a bogus resume presented to USC that falsely claimed their younger daughter, social media star Olivia Jade, rowed in prestigious competitions like the Head of the Charles. Singer and the former coach he paid to create Jade's fake athletic profile are cooperating with investigators and were expected to testify against the couple at trial.

Loughlin has also agreed to pay a $150,000 fine and perform 100 hours of community service. Giannulli has agreed to pay a $250,000 fine and perform 250 hours of community service.

Loughlin pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit wire and mail fraud. Giannulli pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit wire and mail fraud and honest services wire and mail fraud. Prosecutors agreed to dismiss charges of money laundering and federal programs bribery that were added after the case was filed.

Loughlin and Giannulli insisted for over a year that they were innocent and that they believed their payments were legitimate donations to the school or Singer's charity.

They accused prosecutors of withholding evidence that would exonerate them and claimed investigators had sought to trick parents into incriminating themselves. The judge this month rejected the defense's bid to dismiss the case over allegations of misconduct by federal agents.